Open Migration

  • About Open Migration
  • Contact Open Migration
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • Share Open Migration
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
  • IT
  • EN
  • Our mission
  • Border policies
  • Right of asylum
  • Immigration & Integration
  • Data
    • Dashboard
    • Infographics
    • Fact-checking
  • Features
    • In-depth
    • Op-ed
    • Web review
    • Glossary
    • Quiz
  • Donation
Homepage >> Approfondimento >> Significant win for humanitarian visa hopefuls as Italian court rules a power of attorney taken online valid

Significant win for humanitarian visa hopefuls as Italian court rules a power of attorney taken online valid

Share
July 14, 2023 - Fabi Fugazza and Vittoria Garosci
A Rome court has ordered the Italian state to issue humanitarian visas to an Afghan family, importantly dismissing the State’s arguments that online visa applications and power of attorney being taken remotely should invalidate the family’s request.

The Court of Rome has – in a ruling of critical significance for refugees trying to apply for Italy’s humanitarian visa while still in precarious circumstances – ruled in favour of an Afghan family seeking safety in Italy. The presiding judge in June, ordered Italian authorities to issue the family with  humanitarian visas which would allow their entry by 12 July. 

The family of seven had originally sought humanitarian visas for a husband, wife, and 5 minor children in July 2022, to which the State had failed to respond. The husband of the family is a former member of the army, who had trained extensively in Italy, having obtained a degree in legal sciences as well as a master’s degree in law, in Italy. After returning to Afghanistan, he had continued to have close ties with NATO countries and with Italy, where he had come several times for training purposes.

The husband was supposed to have been evacuated in August 2021 alongside his father (who did make it to Italy during the evacuation rush which occurred when the Taliban originally returned to power) but the husband was unable to join his father as he was in another part of Afghanistan and as such couldn’t reach Kabul airport in time. The applicant husband, therefore, had been forced to flee to Tajikistan to escape the Taliban, while his family, wife and children, had remained in Afghanistan, but nonetheless in grave danger noting their ties to their husband/father.

Regardless of the husband’s ties to Italy, the Italian State resisted the application for humanitarian visas, and further objected to the inadmissibility of visa applications done via email, and objected to the admissibility of the power of attorney taken for the wife of the family as it had been being taken remotely.

Typically Italian regulations require powers of attorney for lawyers to be able to act on behalf of applicants to be formalised in the presence of the appointed attorney who must confirm that the instrument was executed before them, but in this case the power of attorney for the wife had been taken online due to the inherent and obvious danger which prevented the wife/mother of the family attempting to reach an embassy (Taliban rules forbid women travelling such distances without a male minder, aside from the inherent danger in Afghanistan generally, at present). 

In her ruling, the judge allowed for the exception to the regular rules for powers of attorney, acknowledging the impracticability and danger inherent in seeking out an embassy in circumstances of such peril in dismissing the State’s concerns about the method in which the power of attorney was obtained, confirming the ability for powers of attorney to be taken “at a distance” in situations like these where there was no real possibility for the power of attorney to be given in the “ordinary” way due to severe safety concerns and general insecurity in a country. 

Her honour stated* “In the light of principles deriving from international jurisprudence, it is … considered that, in compliance with this precise obligation to guarantee a fundamental right, it is legitimate for the appellant to grant her power of attorney to the lawyer by the only means accessible to her at the time, namely at a distance, with authentication of the signature by telematic means. The power of attorney issued by the applicant must therefore be considered valid and reject the objection of inadmissibility for lack of standing raised by the defendant in relation to the same.”   

Her honour also referred to a judgment of the Court of Justice of 18.04.2023 in Case C-1/23 and the principles stated therein, stating that in that case the “Justice has made it clear that ‘it is essential that Member States show, in such situations, the necessary flexibility to allow the persons concerned to actually submit their application for family reunification in good time, by facilitating the submission of such an application and allowing, in particular, the use of remote means of communication. In fact, in absence of such flexibility, requiring, without exception, personal appearance at the time of the application .. in a country marked by armed conflict, the possibilities of travelling to competent diplomatic or consular posts can be considerably limited, so that, in order to satisfy the requirement of personal appearance, such persons, who may, in addition, be minors, would be obliged to wait until the security situation allows them to travel, or expose themselves to inhumane or degrading treatment, or even endangering their own lives, also evoking the detrimental consequences for the right to family unity which are realised in the case of the prevention of reunification, exactly as would be realised in the present case, in the absence of exceptional arrangements for the issue of the power of attorney to make up for the impossibility of access to ordinary ones, subject to possible subsequent regularisation’.

In this way, therefore, the Court considered the power of attorney issued online to be valid, subject to its subsequent ratification of the same once the relevant party has entered Italy.

This represents an extremely significant development in the law in Italy. The decision based the possibility of issuing an online power of attorney on fundamental rights of the national and international law, which arguably is the first time a decision of this kind has been made with relation to circumstances like these. It also means that in similar future cases, where there is similar danger/instability, lawyers representing clients in these precarious circumstances can venture a little more safely into the territory of taking powers of attorney through appropriate online means.

The judge similarly did away with the State’s argument that visa applications must be inadmissible by virtue of them being done by email for similar reasons – another decision of critical importance in humanitarian visa cases which are often characterised by the presence of imminent danger for applicants who are still in countries facing significant political and human rights turmoil.

Last but not least, the decision reaffirmed the availability of a road to humanitarian visas for applicants where the Italian State had “actually used its authority to exercise a form of power and control over the persons of the applicants”*.

The State has appealed the ruling and is not complying with the Court’s order, which is however immediately enforceable. The decision will be revisited in September 2023 due to the Italian State’s appeal, but for the moment this decision retains its significance for humanitarian visa applicants, acknowledging the practical and life-threatening difficulties of meeting in-person procedural requirements where the applicants would be in danger if required to travel to embassies while attempting to seek safety in Italy.

 

This family was provided pro bono legal assistance through the Italian Pro Bono Collaboration for Afghan Refugees (Italian acronym CIPBRA), an initiative created by four international law firms and CILD (with legal work led by Loredana Leo) for the purpose of providing pro bono legal advice and representation to Afghan asylum seekers seeking to access and settle in Italy. 

*Original words from the decision have been translated into English

[Cover picture: Photo of Ricardo Gomez Angel via Unsplash]

Tagged With: Afghan, aslyum, Cipbra, Court, human rights, visa

Support Open Migration! By donating you can help us deliver more high-quality information.MAKE A DONATION

Related articles

  • What do we know about Italian detention centres in Albania?What do we know about Italian detention centres in Albania?
  • European and Italian responsibilities in the Cutro massacreEuropean and Italian responsibilities in the Cutro massacre

Web review

The 10 best articles on refugees and migration 25/2019

Rescued migrants on board the Sea Watch still at sea after 12 days 25 June 2019 Open Migration

Twitter feed

Tweets by open_migration
Donate

Open Migration

Open Migration aims to provide quality information on refugees and migrations, to fill a gap in public opinion and in the media.

Migrations tell the strongest story of our time. Open Migration chooses to tell this story through the analysis of data.

CILD Open Society Foundations Open Society Foundations

Categories

  • Border policies
  • Right of asylum
  • Immigration & Integration
  • Data and Infographics
    • Dashboard
    • Infographics
    • Fact-checking
  • Features
    • In-depth
    • Op-ed
    • Web review
    • Quiz
  • About
  • Privacy policy
Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Contact us

CILD - Coalizione Italiana Libertà e Diritti civili
[email protected]

Follow us

Facebook Open Migration Twitter Open Migration
Licenza Creative Commons
openmigration.org di CILD è distribuito con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Permessi ulteriori rispetto alle finalità della presente licenza possono essere disponibili presso [email protected]

© 2017 Open Migration

This website uses cookies anonymously and exclusively for technical and statistical purposes. Disabling technical cookies may have unexpected effects on the page display mode.OkCookie policy