Open Migration

  • About Open Migration
  • Contact Open Migration
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • Share Open Migration
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
  • IT
  • EN
  • Our mission
  • Border policies
  • Right of asylum
  • Immigration & Integration
  • Data
    • Dashboard
    • Infographics
    • Fact-checking
  • Features
    • In-depth
    • Op-ed
    • Web review
    • Glossary
    • Quiz
  • Donation
Homepage >> Approfondimento >> Criminalizing Immigration: the Case of Texas

Criminalizing Immigration: the Case of Texas

Share
January 24, 2024 - Nancy Nguyen
For years now, US border policies have attempted to stem the flow of migrants from Central America by coercive means, such as arrests and detentions without warrants, and the use of devices (barriers or buoys) to prevent people from entering the country. Now, these policies could take a further leap forward because of two bills recently passed in Texas. Nancy Nguyen writes about this for us.

Contrary to the widely recognized punitive framework within the U.S. immigration system, entering the U.S without authorization was not always regarded as a criminal act. Before the late 19th century, the U.S. lacked formal immigration restrictions. While authorities had the power to deport immigrants who didn’t use an official entry point, they were precluded from detaining and prosecuting them for a federal offense. However, a significant shift occurred in 1929 with the enactment of Section 1325, marking the first instance of criminalizing undocumented immigration along the U.S.-Mexican border.

Since then, there has been a slew of other legislation that supports and funds human resources, weapons, and surveillance technology to uphold this crimmigration apparatus. Now, Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), two key U.S. agencies that manage migration, have the authority to arrest, detain, and search migrants without a warrant.

The most recent manifestation of crimmigration policy is evident in Texas, USA. In 2021, Republican Governor Greg Abbott launched Operation Lone Star, a multi-billion dollar state-led border security effort that criminalizes asylum seekers and other migrants. Abbot declares “We are arresting and jailing anyone who comes across the border illegally and trespasses on private property or on public land.” Under this operation, Texas has prosecuted migrants for state crimes, jailed migrants without charges or access to a lawyer, and added thousands of Texas state troopers and National Guard soldiers to patrol Texas’1,254 mile border with Mexico. 

Beyond criminalization, this operation is also widely known for contributing to severe harm and even death of migrants. National Guard and Texas state troopers deter migrants with trespassing arrests, razor wires, and a floating barrier of four-foot-wide spiked border buoys anchored to the river bottom in the Rio Grande. This has resulted in needless harm to oceanic refugees who, fleeing violence and persecution in their home countries, seek safety in Texas only to find themselves in physical danger at the hands of U.S authorities. 

That is not all. 

In December 2023, Texas’ crimmigration apparatus escalated when Abbott signed into law two new immigration bills. Senate Bill 3 (SB3) grants Texas $1.54 billion for additional state troopers and an estimated additional 50 miles of border barrier. Senate Bill 4 (SB4) expands the power of Texas state officials to arrest, jail, prosecute, and deport migrants believed to have illegally crossed the border with Mexico.

Cornell University professor and immigration expert, Stephen Yale-Loehr, states that SB4 is “unprecedented” and “by far the most anti-immigrant bill that (he has) seen.”

In a radio interview, Abbot states “We are using every tool that can be used, from building a border wall to building these border barriers, to passing this law (…) making it illegal for somebody to enter Texas from another country.” He continues “the only thing that we’re not doing is we’re not shooting people who come across the border, because of course, the Biden administration would charge us with murder.” 

WHAT DOES SB4 DO? 

SB4 would further criminalize actions already deemed illegal at the federal level. Entering the U.S. outside an authorized port of entry is currently a federal offense, typically addressed as a civil matter in the immigration court system. SB4 seeks to reclassify illegal immigration as a state crime, with penalties ranging from a misdemeanor to a felony. This legislation is scheduled to be enforced starting March 2024.

Under SB4, unlawfully crossing into Texas from Mexico would be considered a Class B misdemeanor, carrying penalties of a fine up to $2000 or a maximum of 6 months in jail. The severity of the charge escalates to a felony, punishable by up to 20 years in jail, contingent upon the migrant’s criminal history, such as prior deportations or convictions for specific crimes. Furthermore, the law grants Texas county magistrates and certain judges the authority to order a person’s deportation without due process. 

The legislation enables a judge to drop charges if a migrant consents to voluntary return to Mexico. However, migrants who choose not to return to Mexico immediately would fulfill their sentence and subsequently be escorted by the police to a designated port of entry. At this stage, they might be subject to a felony charge for their refusal to return to Mexico.

When questioned about Texas’s course of action if Mexico refuses to accept migrants deported by the state, Abbott stated, “We’re going to send them right back to Mexico.“ Given that the Mexican government is not obligated to accept non-Mexican immigrants deported by Texas, Abbott’s approach does not solve the cycle of migrant crisis, but rather perpetuates it. SB4 has the potential to strain U.S. relations with Mexico and impede officials from enforcing federal immigration laws, including those intended to support migrants escaping violence and persecution from their home countries. 

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF SB4? 

Texas’ current strategy of criminalizing immigration carries various implications for the power of the state, as SB4 tests the limits of state action and state police power on border enforcement. Immigration law experts contend that Texas is overstepping its authority, as immigration and deportation procedures have traditionally fallen under the jurisdiction of the federal government, rather than the state government. Thus, SB4 is unconstitutional because immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility.

Although the U.S. Supreme Court previously ruled that immigration laws can only be enforced by the federal government, some Texas Republicans have voiced hope that the new law will be supported by the current U.S. Supreme Court, given that former President Donald Trump appointed three conservative justices during his presidency. Abbott and proponents of SB4 contend that the legislation is necessary to deter unlawful border crossings and to address what they perceive as inadequate efforts by the Biden administration in managing the migration crisis.

With the 2024 election fast approaching, Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo speculates that Texas elected officials are using SB4 to “weaponize immigration” and “score political points.”

SB4 has received national and federal pushback. On Jan 4 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit claiming that SB4 interferes with the federal government’s constitutional authority to regulate immigration. Moreover, the ACLU filed federal litigation seeking to block the law. 

Beyond legalities, opponents of the measure have criticized SB4 as unnecessarily punitive and could result in racial profiling and instill fear in immigrant communities in a state where 40% of the population is Latino. Marisa Limón Garza, Executive Director at Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center in Texas, cautioned that SB4 could subject residents to unjust interrogations, searches, seizures, and arrests “based on how ‘foreign’ they look and how they behave.” 

As one of the most stringent state anti-immigration laws in recent U.S. history – SB4 – approaches, it is crucial for the international community to remain attentive. 

 

[Photos Credit: Barbara Zandoval via Unsplash, Greg Bulla via Unsplash]

Tagged With: boarders, Border Patrol, Texas, United States of America

Support Open Migration! By donating you can help us deliver more high-quality information.MAKE A DONATION

Related articles

  • La criminalizzazione delle migrazioni. Il caso del TexasLa criminalizzazione delle migrazioni. Il caso del Texas
  • Climate change and mobility: the case of SomaliaClimate change and mobility: the case of Somalia

Web review

The 10 best articles on refugees and migration 25/2019

Rescued migrants on board the Sea Watch still at sea after 12 days 25 June 2019 Open Migration

Twitter feed

Tweets by open_migration
Donate

Open Migration

Open Migration aims to provide quality information on refugees and migrations, to fill a gap in public opinion and in the media.

Migrations tell the strongest story of our time. Open Migration chooses to tell this story through the analysis of data.

CILD Open Society Foundations Open Society Foundations

Categories

  • Border policies
  • Right of asylum
  • Immigration & Integration
  • Data and Infographics
    • Dashboard
    • Infographics
    • Fact-checking
  • Features
    • In-depth
    • Op-ed
    • Web review
    • Quiz
  • About
  • Privacy policy
Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Contact us

CILD - Coalizione Italiana Libertà e Diritti civili
[email protected]

Follow us

Facebook Open Migration Twitter Open Migration
Licenza Creative Commons
openmigration.org di CILD è distribuito con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Permessi ulteriori rispetto alle finalità della presente licenza possono essere disponibili presso [email protected]

© 2017 Open Migration

This website uses cookies anonymously and exclusively for technical and statistical purposes. Disabling technical cookies may have unexpected effects on the page display mode.OkCookie policy