Open Migration

  • About Open Migration
  • Contact Open Migration
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • Share Open Migration
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
  • IT
  • EN
  • Our mission
  • Border policies
  • Right of asylum
  • Immigration & Integration
  • Data
    • Dashboard
    • Infographics
    • Fact-checking
  • Features
    • In-depth
    • Op-ed
    • Web review
    • Glossary
    • Quiz
  • Donation
Homepage >> Approfondimento >> Tracking hate speech in Europe. A new study shows how tweets reflect public opinion on immigration

Tracking hate speech in Europe. A new study shows how tweets reflect public opinion on immigration

Share
June 9, 2022 - Oiza Q. Obasuyi
Hate speech constitutes one of the most serious threats to coexistence in the European Union. Based on this premise, researchers from the University of Salamanca - Carlos Arcila-Calderòn, Patricia Sànchez-Holgado, Cristina Quintana-Moreno, Javier-J. Amores and David Blanco-Herrero - have shown that the presence of xenophobic messages on social media can be used to predict public opinion and citizen attitudes of social acceptance towards immigrants in Europe. We spoke about it with David Blanco-Herrero.

1. What was the research study about?

The study was published in the academic journal Comunicar (vol. XXX, No. 71, 2 April 2022) one of the most relevant and prestigious publications in the fields of Communication and Education. This study was produced within the framework of two EU-funded projects: HumMingBird and PHARM. The study focused on the occurrence of hate speech on social media as a way to predict the social acceptance of migrants and refugees in European countries. We measured in what region there is more hate, in which one social acceptance is greater, and we also studied the proportion of immigration in each, to study whether that plays a role in influencing the other two factors. A greater presence of immigration was found to positively correlate with greater social acceptance, and social acceptance was found to negatively correlate with the presence of hate speech.

2. How did you come up with the idea of tracking tweets on Twitter to analyse hate speech towards migrants?

Even though it is not the most used platform, Twitter has been commonly studied because of its relevance in the formation of public opinion. We have been studying hate speech on Twitter for some time, and one of the main conclusions of our work is that studying hate speech on a social network such as Twitter could help predict social acceptance toward migrants and refugees.

3. How does the monitoring procedure work?

We originally developed and trained an automatic detector for hate speech against migrants and refugees in Spanish, and then improved it and trained it to function also in Italian and Greek. Then, we downloaded more than 850.000 geolocated tweets – this was important, as we wanted to have measures in the different regions (level NUTS 2) – from European countries and used automatic translation to run them through our detector. This detector was trained using shallow and deep learning techniques, offering satisfactory results.

4. What was the most interesting aspect of the results?

The most interesting aspect was the capacity of hate speech monitoring on Twitter to predict social acceptance toward migrants and refugees. It was something that would allow a faster and constant measure of social acceptance because otherwise, this would need to be measured with large-scale surveys that usually take longer and are more expensive. This has practical implications, as it could allow different private and public institutions more constant and cheaper monitoring of social acceptance –future studies could follow similar lines with other objects of study, such as attitudes toward other minorities, for instance–. Beyond that, we achieved one of the most complete pictures of the levels of hate speech in Europe between 2015 and 2020. The aforementioned use of geolocated tweets was also relevant, due to the small proportion of geolocation, which has avoided previous studies and has demanded a great effort in order to achieve such a big sample.

5. What are the countries in which hate speech levels are higher?

Italy and Greece have shown generally high comparative levels of hate speech between 2015 and 2020, just like some Eastern countries, such as Hungary. The Italian and Greek case could be partly explained by the fact that the detector was trained initially in those languages – and thus it may have been slightly more effective in picking up hate speech in those languages.

6. Do you have any suggestions for confronting racism and hate speech on social media?

It is always a difficult issue because most measures adopted could clash with freedom of speech, which is always problematic. Constant monitoring and analysis, like was conducted in this and other studies, is essential, because the more we know about the phenomenon, the easier it is to tackle it. Some complementary ideas could be in the areas of education, media literacy, or the improvement of attitudes toward migrants and refugees (and any other minorities).

 

This research study was produced within Humming Bird. Humming Bird is a Horizon 2020 research that aims to improve the mapping and understanding of changing migration flows.

Tagged With: hatespeech, Immigration, migration, racism, social media

Support Open Migration! By donating you can help us deliver more high-quality information.MAKE A DONATION

Related articles

  • Out of the European Council comes an even stronger Fortress EuropeOut of the European Council comes an even stronger Fortress Europe
  • Undocumented and vulnerable: the reality of migrant women in EuropeUndocumented and vulnerable: the reality of migrant women in Europe

Web review

The 10 best articles on refugees and migration 25/2019

Rescued migrants on board the Sea Watch still at sea after 12 days 25 June 2019 Open Migration

Twitter feed

Tweets by open_migration
Donate

Open Migration

Open Migration aims to provide quality information on refugees and migrations, to fill a gap in public opinion and in the media.

Migrations tell the strongest story of our time. Open Migration chooses to tell this story through the analysis of data.

CILD Open Society Foundations Open Society Foundations

Categories

  • Border policies
  • Right of asylum
  • Immigration & Integration
  • Data and Infographics
    • Dashboard
    • Infographics
    • Fact-checking
  • Features
    • In-depth
    • Op-ed
    • Web review
    • Quiz
  • About
  • Privacy policy
Newsletter

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Contact us

CILD - Coalizione Italiana Libertà e Diritti civili
[email protected]

Follow us

Facebook Open Migration Twitter Open Migration
Licenza Creative Commons
openmigration.org di CILD è distribuito con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Permessi ulteriori rispetto alle finalità della presente licenza possono essere disponibili presso [email protected]

© 2017 Open Migration

This website uses cookies anonymously and exclusively for technical and statistical purposes. Disabling technical cookies may have unexpected effects on the page display mode.OkCookie policy